Our Latest Online Backup Reviews:Vembu SyncBlaze
Industry LinksTools and Graphs
Substantial gap remains between beliefs and practices in retention policies
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – Jan. 10, 2013 — /BackupReview.info/ — Symantec Corp. (Nasdaq: SYMC) today announced the findings of its 2012 Information Retention and eDiscovery Survey which examined how enterprises manage their ever-growing volumes of electronically stored information (ESI) and prepare for the eventuality of an eDiscovery request. The study found the percentage of organizations without a formal information retention plan dropped by half from the 2011 survey. However, even with this improvement, organizations struggle with implementing their information retention plans as only a third of organizations report their plan is fully operational.
Read Blog Post: If You Fail to Implement Your Information Retention Plan, Then You Plan to Fail
Tweet this: Symantec survey reveals improvement in information retention planning but more failures in policy implementation http://bit.ly/SiAeXn
Non-implemented plans risky to organizations
Even more concerning is that while they received on average 17 requests for electronically stored information, these requests failed 31 percent of the time. This is significantly higher than the 20 percent of failures reported in 2011. Each time a failure occurs, the organization is at risk. Forty-three percent reported the inability to make decisions in a timely fashion as the biggest consequence of these failures. Other consequences reported include damage to reputation, compromised legal position, fines, raised profile as a litigation target and court sanctions.
“The survey highlights that, although there is a reduction in the number of organizations without an information retention plan, organizations haven’t fully funded and implemented their plans,” said Trevor Daughney, Director, Information Intelligence Group, Symantec. “With the number of ESI requests and failures to obtain requested information increasing, organizations face risks that are much more costly in the long run than implementing their plans.”
No improvement in gap between retention beliefs & practices
The most reported negative consequences resulting from preserving more electronically stored information than necessary include: Increased costs associated with collection, analysis and review (54 percent); increased time spent to collect, analyze and review ESI (47 percent); increased risk that sensitive information may be disclosed (44 percent); compromised position in potential or actual litigation (27 percent); and information unintentionally made available for potential future litigation (28 percent).
The survey also reports that organizations are keeping information longer than is needed, and keeping the data within backups rather than archives for legal holds, which reduces efficiencies when performing an ESI request. The survey reveals that 38 percent of data that organizations back up is not needed or shouldn’t be kept in backup. In fact, respondents say that a third of backup data (34 percent) shouldn’t be kept and is unnecessary due to litigation risk.
More than half of organizations keep that data indefinitely: 56 percent of organizations reported that their backup storage is used for infinite retention that is dedicated to legal hold. This has grown from 43 percent in 2011 and continues to get worse. Further, 85 percent of organizations routinely perform legal holds in their backups, which are not designed to be accessed in the same way as an archive.
Majority of organizations impacted by data privacy laws & regulations
Note to Editors: If you would like additional information on Symantec Corporation and its products, please visit the Symantec News Room at www.symantec.com/news. All prices noted are in U.S. dollars and are valid only in the United States.
Symantec and the Symantec Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Symantec Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. and other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.
Forward-looking Statements: Any forward-looking indication of plans for products is preliminary and all future release dates are tentative and are subject to change. Any future release of the product or planned modifications to product capability, functionality, or feature are subject to ongoing evaluation by Symantec, and may or may not be implemented and should not be considered firm commitments by Symantec and should not be relied upon in making purchasing decisions.
General Tags: software as a service, online data backup, backing up online, cloud computing, data security, online file backup, online file storage, online backup services, SaaS, top rated online backups, online backup news, CEO interviews, online backup, online backup companies, online backup reviews, data storage, compare online backups, online backup providers directory
Like us on Facebook
Sponsored Links:Data Deposit Box Asigra Bacula Systems